Following the misunderstandings between Bridgepoint and Education, Inc. And Ashford, there was an agreement that, which was made to settle the disputes. According to court rulings, the Attorney General said that, the procedure used to enroll students in Ashford University was inacceptable. It was further argued that, the university used misleading information to convince student to enroll in the university. Although Bridgepoint and Education, Inc. And Ashford repudiated their mistakes, they decided to enter into an agreement to resolve their issues. Ashford settlement Iowa was made on May 15, 2014.
Among the issues that lead to the misunderstanding between Bridgepoint & Education, Inc. And Ashford the use of force and misleading information to sale the name of this particular university. There was a claim that the university did not faithfully disclose all the relevant material facts to its students. In addition, Ashford used dubious means to recruit and enroll learners. Some people also claimed that a technology fee was imposed to students six weeks after they were enrolled.
There are several issues, which were addressed during the agreement. In the agreement, the roles of the administrator were outlined. For instance, administrator was appointed. His main duty was to oversee Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And Ashford. In addition, administrator was to keep monitoring whether the two parties complied with the agreement for a period of three years. He was to report his findings to the Iowa Attorney General.
There was also an issue of whether the administrator was to work for university or Bridgepoint Education, Inc. It was agree that the administrator was supposed to be a neutral party. His job was to evaluate whether the settlement terms were effective in solving the misunderstanding. After three years of closely monitoring the two parties, he was to submit his report the Iowa A. G.
Under the settlement terms, both Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And the university were supposed to pay a certain amount of money to the Iowa Attorney General. The payment to be made by both parties amounted to 7,250,000 dollars. This money was to be used according to directions of the Attorney General. Some of it was to be reimbursement to residents who were enrolled in university before the award.
A need arose to as to who met the qualifications to get a portion of the money. As per the General of the states, those residents who had been enrolled in the university before and in during the time when the settlement was be made. It was clear that, the admin had no power to determine those who were qualified to get a portion of these funds.
To the students, the award brought many changes. For instance, they the students were to get genuine, complete and accurate information concerning the university. The settlement also prohibited use of misleading information. In addition, they were not to engage in all sorts of unfair practices.
There was also a need to give clear means of communication. This was to facilitate communication and settlement of any issues arising from the agreement. In case of any claim, the administrator was supposed to become the first person to get informed. For complicated issues, the Iowa A. G was to be informed.
Among the issues that lead to the misunderstanding between Bridgepoint & Education, Inc. And Ashford the use of force and misleading information to sale the name of this particular university. There was a claim that the university did not faithfully disclose all the relevant material facts to its students. In addition, Ashford used dubious means to recruit and enroll learners. Some people also claimed that a technology fee was imposed to students six weeks after they were enrolled.
There are several issues, which were addressed during the agreement. In the agreement, the roles of the administrator were outlined. For instance, administrator was appointed. His main duty was to oversee Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And Ashford. In addition, administrator was to keep monitoring whether the two parties complied with the agreement for a period of three years. He was to report his findings to the Iowa Attorney General.
There was also an issue of whether the administrator was to work for university or Bridgepoint Education, Inc. It was agree that the administrator was supposed to be a neutral party. His job was to evaluate whether the settlement terms were effective in solving the misunderstanding. After three years of closely monitoring the two parties, he was to submit his report the Iowa A. G.
Under the settlement terms, both Bridgepoint Education, Inc. And the university were supposed to pay a certain amount of money to the Iowa Attorney General. The payment to be made by both parties amounted to 7,250,000 dollars. This money was to be used according to directions of the Attorney General. Some of it was to be reimbursement to residents who were enrolled in university before the award.
A need arose to as to who met the qualifications to get a portion of the money. As per the General of the states, those residents who had been enrolled in the university before and in during the time when the settlement was be made. It was clear that, the admin had no power to determine those who were qualified to get a portion of these funds.
To the students, the award brought many changes. For instance, they the students were to get genuine, complete and accurate information concerning the university. The settlement also prohibited use of misleading information. In addition, they were not to engage in all sorts of unfair practices.
There was also a need to give clear means of communication. This was to facilitate communication and settlement of any issues arising from the agreement. In case of any claim, the administrator was supposed to become the first person to get informed. For complicated issues, the Iowa A. G was to be informed.
About the Author:
Our website gives former students and employees the opportunity to learn about Ashford settlement Iowa law. Come and meet the administration team online at http://www.ashfordsettlement.com.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire