Philosophical Perspectives On Literature Psychoanalysis Washington DC

By Christine Powell


Treatment and psychoanalytic counselling look to assist the patient by focusing on aspects of an individual's life not necessarily accessible through conscious means. The basic premise of this theoretical orientation serves to explain unnerving actions and why these instances arise by outlining the structure of one's psyche. The going article will take us through the theme Counseling on psychoanalysis Washington DC.

Now first let me explicate Jungian psychotherapy and its workings in literature. Jungian analysis delves into what is famously known as archetypes. Archetypes are models, patterns or traces and according to Jung they are embedded in the collective unconscious of the mind and are universally recurring motifs in the culture of consciousness.

These defense mechanisms often displayed themselves as maladaptive behavior and presented themselves in therapy as symptomology of biological defects, such as twitching, nervousness and at its worst hysteria (panic attacks). Freud believed that through the technique of free-association a patient could reenact mentally the past traumas and so through insight could come to terms with the past event.

This meant that the client would be free of the symptomology and change their behavior to more suitable strategies for coping with stress. Freud's original ideas were based on his theory of child development that led to a model of the mind in which the person's mental processes were divided into three parts. The first to develop was the ID; Freud saw this as the fundamental drive that was innate within all babies.

When discussing the course of treatment, the analyst will most likely talk regarding years rather than months, which may not comply with many patients' financial abilities. Also, psychoanalytic counselling naturally leads to a hierarchical relationship in which the counsellor holds all the power due to the subjectivity of the practice. This same subjectively does not allow for empirical, quantitative data, making the topic incredibly difficult to support or study.

The archetypal model of the witch would be a misnomer for radically oriented feminists, and they would label the attributes of witches as misunderstood products of masculine imagination. Freudian theories of the libido are taken as interpretative constructs for the reading of literature, they are taken seriously by the going of the literature.

Since Freud's death in 1939 the neo-Freudians have modified his methods and differing schools of thought have honed and developed psychoanalysis in many different directions. This has meant that modern psychoanalysis may present itself in many forms. Followers of Freud such as Jung, Adler, Horney, Fromm and many others all have contributed particular insights into the therapeutic process.

What is impressive here is that these fantasies are not made by George Bernard Shaw with conscious intent but are manifestations of his unconscious. This raises the question for feminists-was Shaw Oedipal fixated? During the 70's the notorious Jacque Lacan made a sea of change in psychoanalysis with a critical rereading of the works of Freud. Lacan created a storm of controversy not only in psychoanalytic circles but also created a problem of interpreting the language which in his psychoanalytic terms disturbs the paragon of the unity contained in a realized self.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire