For More About A Whistleblower San Bernardino CA Is Worth Visiting

By Harold Harris


A whistleblower is a person who exposes a certain activity or information in or on an organization. Other spellings for the term are whistle blower and whistle-blower. The information or activity exposed is usually deemed wrong, illegal, or unethical within the organization whether public or private. It may be necessary to flee or seek legal protection after whistleblowing because there may be some form of retaliation from concerned subjects. To learn more regarding a whistleblower San Bernardino CA offers a good place to make a visit.

The term whistleblower is derived from the whistle used by referees to signal that an illegal or foul play has been committed by a player. Ralph Nader was a United States civic activist, and is credited for coining the term in the 1970s. Nader coined the term to avoid the negative connotations that exist in other words such as snitches and informers. The negative connotations were very prevalent in the 1970s.

Wrongdoing falls in many different classes. Some of the major categories are violation of organizational laws, policy or regulations, fraud, corruption, threat to national security, and threat to public interest. One may choose to whistle-blow externally or internally. Internal whistleblowing is more common compared to external whistleblowing. In internal whistleblowing, the information is reported to parties within the organization. The party to which the reporting is done may be a department, other employees, or the management.

Systems for reporting misconduct exist in most organizations. According to research, efficiency is higher in systems where whistleblowers have a choice of options. It is much better that the individual remains anonymous after making the report. Because of lack of retaliation, anonymous reporting mechanisms encourage workers to report misconduct when they see it.

The second category of whistle-blowers is external whistle-blowers. In this category, information on misconduct is reported to persons and entities outside (third parties) the organization. The third party is usually independent from the organization in question. The nature and severity of misconduct usually determines the kind of third party chosen. Common examples of third parties are watchdog agencies, the media, law enforcement agencies, and lawyers.

Cases of retaliation against whistle-blowers have been increasing over the years because of the conventional methods of whistleblowing. As a result, a third method of whistleblowing has been invented. This method involves using an external agency to report misconduct to the management of an organization without revealing the identity of the whistle-blower. An example of an organization that offers such services is the International Whistleblowers.

Whistle blowers are often offered legal protection in most countries. The legal protection varies from one country to another and is dependent on many factors. Some of the factors that affect legal protection include country of original activity, how secrets were revealed, where secrets were revealed, and how misconduct finally become public knowledge.

One needs to be brave to whistle-blow, given the amount of retaliation they stand to face. The list of negative consequences has no end. The list includes isolation, social stigmatization, assassination of character, humiliation, broken promises, formal reprimand, disillusionment, and difficult court proceedings among others.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire