What American Jury System Problems The Citizens Are Facing

By Ida Dorsey


Judges are assisted by certain people when verdicts are decided on criminals. Twelve members are usually compose these groups. America commonly use this mechanism.

Today, the setup is already becoming corrupted and unfair, as well. Citizens are facing a number of American jury system problems which the mechanism is posing. Other activists are wanting to reform and even abolish this due to the issues. Citizens are facing the following issues.

The commencement of these hearings typically take long times since individuals who could possibly become parts of the juries will still have to be looked for. Lots of potential jurors will still have to be screened. Those who are not on parole and with no criminal records, among other conditions are filtered out. If these occur in populous cities, the selection process for the jurors can certainly take long times.

Another problem in this system is the qualifications and expertise of those members of the juries. Different professions are typically possessed by these individuals. Some could be small business owners, plumbers, teachers, and other day jobs. College degrees in the field of Law are typically not completed by them. As such, their judgments will usually be based on their own views and opinions.

They may also not know all of the legal terms that could be present in different cases. The judges will need to explain these legal terms to these persons before they proceed with the trails. These explanations will certainly add to the lengths of time that will be spent for these hearings. There are also cases where these individuals still do not fully comprehend what these terms mean even after these explanations.

Ideally, a trial that needs the involvement of a jury should only take a single day. However, because of situations like misunderstandings, a trial could be taking a month. Since a hearing is requiring the presence of each individual, they might be productive during this time and even incurring losses if they are running and operating their respective businesses.

Cases could be filed by people following certain stages. Some charges should be heard by lower courts while the others are handled by the court of appeals. However, the necessity of juries might be reached by certain cases even though these are not necessary. The charges could be totally ridiculous or comical and sound judgments can even be made by children for them. These are further loads to the courts.

The frequency of being summoned for a jury might differ. This frequency will be depending on how many trials a court will be hearing at a time. For instance, a big city could have numerous cases filed in a court. In this case, they will also be summoning numerous jurors. Qualified members might only be less in number and for that, a court could be summoning them on several occasions.

These problems are only some for this mechanism. The reformation of this jury system has been supported by lots of organizations. However, lots of individuals want to have this mechanism entirely abolished, too. These requests should be checked and studied by the supreme courts to ensure that due justice will be given to the accusers and defendants.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire